This book provides a child-centered perspective on the inter-generational cycle of poverty and dysfunction in urban ghettos by combining a wealth of information with sophisticated normative analysis.

How can we end the inter-generational cycle of poverty and dysfunction in the US's urban ghettos? This ground-breaking and controversial book is the first to provide a child-centered perspective on the subject by combining a wealth of social science information with sophisticated normative analysis to support novel reforms-to child protection law and practice, family law, and zoning- that would quickly end that cycle. The rub is that the reforms needed would entail further suffering and loss of liberty for adults in these communities, and liberal advocacy organizations and academics are so adult-centered in their sympathies and thinking that they reflexively oppose any such measures. Liberals have instead promoted one ineffectual parent-focused program after another, in an ideologically-driven quest for the magic pill that can save both adults and children in these communities at the same time. This `insider critique' of liberal child welfare policy reveals a dilemma that liberals have yet to face squarely: there is an ineradicable conflict of interests between many young children and their parents, especially in areas of concentrated poverty, and one must choose sides. It is a must read for legal academics, political scientists, urban policy experts, as well as professionals working in social work, law, education, urban planning, legislative offices, and administrative agencies.

'This is a brilliant, bold, original, deeply interesting, and extraordinarily important book. Dwyer challenges the dominant liberal position for failing black children,which helps perpetuate the intergenerational cycle of poverty and dysfunction plaguing so many black families.' - Elizabeth Bartholet, Professor of Law and Faculty Director of Child Advocacy Program, Harvard Law School 'James Dwyer's book offers inconvenient truths with cogent and controversial proposals for reforming the child protective service system in the United States. Those concerned with the safety and wellbeing of children as well those who desire to support birth families have long ignored the facts Dwyer presents. Liberals and conservatives alike should carefully consider Dwyer's observations and proposals.' - Richard J. Gelles, Ph.D., Joanne and Raymond Welsh Chair of Child Welfare and Family Violence, University of Pennsylvania